Recently in Entrepreneurship Category

The Design of Business

| | Comments (0)

Imagine your dismay when this hypothetical product has all manner of dysfunctions that require endless workarounds to compensate for its bad design. Would you settle for that? Not likely. Odds are excellent that in short order you'd be on your way back to the store and standing at the returns desk.

If we won't tolerate badly designed products in our lives (MS Windows notwithstanding), why do we tolerate badly designed businesses? When you consider the relative importance in our lives of that from which we derive our livelihood, we should have far less tolerance for dysfunction at work than we do at home.

The problem is that dysfunctional organizational environments is mostly all we've ever known.

The great anthropologist Edward T. Hall in his classic book The Silent Language said that "culture is largely invisible to its participants." In our lifetimes there has been much research and education and popular awareness of corporate cultures. However, what has remained invisible is the culture of business.

For those who are not conversant with the concept, culture can be thought of as that set of beliefs and assumptions about reality that order all personal and social activities. In the culture of business, there are many assumptions which are never seriously questioned. An example would be how many direct reports a manager should have. The rule of thumb is six to eight. No one questions job costing as a legitimate accounting technique.

As a reality check, i personally know a CEO of a $600M company who has 500 direct reports and the people who invented job costing were very aware that it introduces very serious distortions into understanding how companies make money.

One of the great failings of Western culture is that we tend to fixate on symptoms when systems are dysfunctional (like our health) rather than striving to understand what the underlying causes are that are giving rise to the observable symptoms. Nowhere is this more true than in organizational life.

We have created a massive infrastructure of consultants, writers and thinkers who exhort us to have emotional intelligence, have fierce conversations, understand the five dysfunctions of a team, be one minute managers and remain calm when someone moves our cheese. This infrastructure virtually without exception if focused on treating symptoms and never really asks the hard question, "What is it about the way in which we have designed businesses, leadership and management that is giving rise the the many dysfunctions of which anyone who has spent any time in any kind of organization is intimately aware?"

Asking this question, brings to visibility, the heretofore invisible layer of business culture. It puts us in the uncomfortable position of having to question our most sacred assumptions, to bump off our sacred cows, to throw ourselves into the non-linear space of not knowing.

Most people do not find this a happy experience.

Sadly most of us are willing to accept the corrosive effects of chronic pain of living with dysfunction for the short spike of acute pain of working through the unknown and arriving at a new way of being and doing in which the dysfunctions have disappeared.

We know that organizations cannot remain static. The world is changing rapidly and organizations that fail to adapt and evolve become obsolete and incapable of delivering adequate value to their constituents to survive. The Quality disciplines (TQM, Six Sigma, Lean) are powerful tools and have had a huge impact on our ability to do more with less.

In recent years, the body of work that perhaps has come closest to challenging the norms of business culture has been Goldratt's Theory of Constraints. If you haven't read The Goal, It's Not Luck, and Critical Chain, you need to do so.

But the issue remains that from a design standpoint, if organizations were better designed, we would not have to deal with the incredible dysfunctions that organizations manifest and I would make the case that we cannot remotely afford the cost of these dysfunctions in what is rapidly becoming a just-in-time world.

How do we attack this problem? The starting point is to realize the assumptions that went into the design of what i call traditional management practice.

The inventors of management as we know it were 19th century intellectuals whose worldview was Newtonian, that is they understood the universe to be a cosmic machine. At some levels this understanding was accurate, but a long way from complete.

We now know the universe is self-organizing and that below it's more superficial machine-like qualities, creation is much more complex and unpredictable. The fact that Complexity Theory has shown us that all systems have a natural propensity to self-organize should help us begin to see how we need to attack the redesign of organizations, leadership and management.

The key elements are how we structure organizational relationships, how we compensate, how we provide feedback, how we educate, train and orient our employees.

If you look at traditional management practice from the point of view of Complexity Theory, it becomes apparent that much of traditional management is designed to prevent self-organization. Surely it makes more sense to design organizations which swim with the currents of how the universe appears to actually work rather than against them.

When Systems Go Non-Linear

| | Comments (0)
We are reminded today of the old Chinese curse, "May you live in interesting times!"

We are in interesting times indeed.  What makes for interesting times is non-linearity.  In other words when a system that has been functioning in a linear, predictable way suddenly or not so suddenly, the system goes haywire and predictability disappears.  

We are in one of those times.  These times are characterized by dislocation, pain, and uncertainty.  What to do?

First of all, dealing with what's real is essential.  As human beings we love to stick our heads in the sand and pretend "This isn't happening!"  The people who bought homes an hour and a half from work because that's the only place they could afford the mortgage are now between a rock and a hard place because of the price of gas.  Can't sell the SUV, can't sell the house.

Dealing with what's real means tackling the problem head-on and not assuming it's going to get better somehow.

If you're not sure what to do, talk to people, solicit ideas.  Run experiments so you can gather real-world information.  If you are a business person whose business has gone non-linear, while not fun, is inevitably a source of new and creative opportunities.  Chances are if your business has gone non-linear, others have as well.  What can you do to help them?

Interesting times are actually the times of greatest opportunity.  But not for the complacent or faint of heart. 


When was your last "ah-ha!" moment?

| | Comments (0)
When was the last time you had an "ah-ha!" moment?

Seems as though they come in two versions.  The first version is when your worldview shifts.  These ah-has are usually permanent.  Once things have shifted, they don't ever go back.  Discovering complexity theory was that for me, the notion that all systems have a natural tendency to self-organize.  Head slappers.

The other type is more ephemeral and usually an observation or insight on ourselves or our organizations.  These are at least as if not more important but have a tendency to slip away quickly.  If you've ever flown on a day with low overcast skies and as the plane takes off, at some point gets above the cloud deck into astonishing sunlight.  Sooner or later, however the plane begins its decent back into the murk.  So it is with these moments of insight.

How to somehow insure that these insights are not lost?  

1) Write them down.
2) Act on them.  Now.

That's what you can do in my experience.

I had one today.  And I'm acting on it by writing this blog.

The insight was this: The output of my work is not nearly as creative as the output of my brain.  

Anyone else ever share this reality?  (Raise your hand.) 

There is a reason for this, actually, but it is a problem that is amenable to process improvement.  Here's the issue:

Accomplishing anything involves two design problems:  the first is the design of what you would like to create.  The second design problem is how to execute the results of the first design problem.  What normally happens is one of two things:

1. We start trying to figure out the second design problem concurrent with the first design problem.  This turns the whole exercise into a fur ball and typically fatally compromises both the quality of the vision and the quality of execution.

2. We get so bogged down in the details of execution that the execution is late or never gets done at all and as a result we don't innovate at anything like the pace either of which we are conceptually capable or that we need to to maximize mining of our markets.

Solutions:

1. Never worry about execution during the creative design phase.

2. Build the organizational infrastructure for execution.  Hire an assistant, hire a project manager, contract with an agency, bring in a temp, set up an office space, put up a big bulletin board, do whatever you need to do to capture those ideas and get them executed quickly.

3. Engrave the following mantra in your brain: "The Key to Innovation is Miniaturization."  Execute all your ideas on a small scale.  They will execute much more quickly, you won't got bogged down with budget discussions, accountants and lawyers won't get involved (and no one can shut down execution faster than lawyers and accountants) and if the idea turns out to be a dud, so what?  The cost was relatively trivial.  If it actually works, then put more resources behind it and push.  Your worst enemy is your own organization.  

It's worth remembering that the fundamental imperative behind every organization is to make sure that absolutely nothing new ever happens.  To get something new happening you have to push people out of their comfort zones, or (if you're smart) pull people out of their comfort zones.  Bring a wild new idea to the table and everyone's brakes lock.  Bring a proven concept to the table and people will at least listen and chances are someone will get excited and pick up the ball and start to run.

Now I've got to go figure out how to apply this wisdom to my own life and business!

Is Your Business Making You Values Blind?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
I was having a conversation with a client the other day and we got to talking about one of the more insidious risks in business, creeping values blindness.  

The classic example is the tobacco industry.  One hundred years ago, tobacco was an honorable business to be in.  But as it grew and became a very valuable (financially) institution, and knowledge of the deleterious effects of tobacco became known, its members found themselves unable to make appropriate value judgments, such as saying, "We really should get out of this business because it's killing people."  Instead (as further discovery revealed) they began figuring out how to target women and children, develop additives that made cigarettes more addictive and generally compounded the felony of remaining in that business.  The ultimate expression of this was the spectacle of the nine CEOs of the largest tobacco companies on national television lying to Congress about their knowledge and activities.

As our knowledge and understanding evolve, we have to be very careful that our business doesn't stunt our growth.  The case for global warming is another example.  The only major country in which there is any serious debate about global warming is the US.  Why?  Because of a very carefully orchestrated disinformation campaign by the oil companies.  (For extensive documentation of this just Google "global warming disinformation".)  Given the potential impacts of climate change, how can the people involved justify these kinds of actions which by any standard of measure are immoral?  

In my writing on self-management, I've made the case that people's behavior is a product of the ecosystem in which they work.  It's not difficult to see how people get locked into a system where there is way too much peer pressure for individuals who have qualms to be able to change the system.  The system has way too much inertia to allow for a voice of sanity to be heard.  Meanwhile, the participants in the system are stuck in a moral dead end.  The knowledge of the inappropriateness of what they are doing is there, but they are unable to respond so they have no choice but to resolve this cognitive dissonance by conjuring up some justification for their behavior.  Taken to its extreme, this can have serious legal implications (e.g. tobacco).  For the entrepreneur, the issue is more one of developing a case of values blindness which stunts our spiritual growth.

Our understanding of what is healthy and in alignment with nature is growing by leaps and bounds.  Is your business built around an obsolete model?  If your business has to do with food, large energy consumption, large percentage of cost or value in throw-away packaging, or is of little intrinsic value (e.g. impulse purchases), this would be a good time to think long and hard about how to transform your business.

Would there be a cost?  Sure.  Would there be dislocation?  Sure.  But think of it this way, someone out there without the liability of the organizational and market inertia you have is laying awake at night trying to figure out how to displace you with products and services that make yours either irrelevant or unappealing to generations of consumers who are looking at what they buy in very different ways than has historically been the case.  

Ultimately the issue is that in times of great change, the status quo is the most dangerous strategy.  Not only does it bring a significant business risk, but values blindness is a significant personal risk as well. 

The Five Most Dangerous Words in Business

| | Comments (0)
The great anthropologist Edward T Hall said in his classic book The Silent Language, culture is largely invisible to its participants.  Culture, of course can be defined as those assumptions and beliefs about the nature of reality that never get questioned.  There has been much said and written about corporate cultures over the years and a quick search on amazon for "the culture of business" brings up many books on doing business in other countries.  But what assumptions do we make in how we organize, compensate, provide feedback, educate and orient our employees?  There are many assumptions and beliefs that never get scrutinized.  

And they cause big trouble.

Let's be honest, American businesses (and probably all businesses) are filled with all kinds of dysfunctions that create stress, inefficiencies, loss of productivity, waste, and stunt the development of the talent for which we pay so dearly.  The assumption that is the most deadly to business today can be summarized in the five most dangerous words in business:

That's just how it is.

It's almost if instead of the ten commandments, Moses came down the mountain with the blueprint for the modern organization.  An act of God determines how we do things and the dysfunctions we deal with, well, that's just how it is.

Except it isn't.

Organization design, management practices and processes are human artifacts, not holy relics.  They are the product of human design processes.  And anything humans design, humans can redesign.

How is it that we have fallen into the trap of assuming that when things go wrong that someone must be responsible?  Why is it that when there is a lack of trust among employees (or worse, leaders) that the people are the problem?  The facts are:

1) The people are uncaring, negligent, incompetent, and indifferent or
2) The people are caring, attentive, competent and committed, but are responding to the pressures and rewards of the ecosystem in which they work and to which they pay very close attention, and the dysfunctional behavior is symptomatic of the system in which they work.

What other options are there?

If you believe your people are caring and committed, then the only place to look is the system.

As Sherlock Holmes once said, "When all other alternatives are eliminated, whatever is left, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."

We do not have the luxury of putting up with the wasted efforts of people working at cross purposes in our companies.  We have to reinvent business around a different model.  We need to study the culture of business and realize the trap we've fallen into is that we have gotten so used to our organizational dysfunctions we assume that, "That's just how it is."

The good news is that nature is showing us the way.  More on this over the next few weeks.  

Meanwhile, the next time you let out a sign of exasperation about the dysfunctions in your organization and hear those five most dangerous words wander through your mind, I hope all your alarms go off.  The right response is, "We created this mess, and by God we can fix it." 

Technology and Strategy

| | Comments (0)
I did an interview yesterday for a podcast on webteks.com that will be up in a week or two but the subject was important enough that it deserves some comment and that is the relationship between technology and strategy.  

This is a huge subject but the critical point here is that one can no longer think about business strategy without technology being integral to both the vision of where a company should go and the strategy of how to get it there.  Technology is now inseparable from both vision and strategy.  

An example:  Anyone who has been to Bentonville, Arkansas has seen the windowless concrete cube that must be seven stories on a side.  That is Wal*Mart's data center although data bunker might be a more apt description.  If you are a vendor and subscribe to their service, you can watch your products going over the scanners in every store in their system in real time.  Could Wal*Mart exist without technology?  How could mere human beings keep track of $300+ billion worth of goods and the payroll details of over a million employees without technology?  Not remotely possible.

Marketing (webinars, email campaigns, social networking), administration (workflow, document management), sales (CRM, videoconferencing), operations (GPS, ERP, RFID), finance (accounting, electronic banking, EDI), HR (online recruiting, learning management, human resources information systems, intranets), purchasing (extranets, EDI) are just a few of the ways that technology is infiltrating and transforming everything we do in business.

But here's the challenge.  Most of the leaders of our companies can remember a time when they didn't have a PC on their desk.  Many grew up at time when typing was something secretaries did, certainly not executives.  The personal computer was something that got bolted on to their lives and careers, not built in.  In many cases they don't have an intuitive grasp of technology.  It's worth remembering that many of the younger entrepreneurs among us (and perhaps your competitors) cannot remember a time when there wasn't a PC in the house.

Another reality is that technology is a tool.  Some people get tools and some don't.  It is some kind of brain thing.  You can watch someone who gets tools pick up any tool and just see how they are processing its capabilities and applications just by studying it's form.  No judgement implied here.  In his ground-breaking book Frames of Mind, Harvard professor and MacArthur Fellow Howard Gardner postulated at least six types of intelligence.  So lack of instinct for tools only means that other types of intelligence are likely to be present.  However, in a technological world, the ability to grasp the strategic importance and potential applications of technology cannot be overstated.  

It is critical that business leaders do a rigorous self-assessment.  If technology is not your strong suit, then you must find people to team with who really get both technology and business.  If you have internal IT people, in too many cases they will not be strong business or strategic thinkers.  Even if you do have strategic level people who get technology, it will behoove you to team up with an outside firm that is relatively product agnostic to offer a second opinion.  Technology is like anything else, people have their tastes, biases and experience that shapes their opinions, not always objectively.

If you do have an interest in and aptitude for technology, as a business leader, you need to:

  1. Stay current with the technology press.  Subscribe to E-Week, Information Week or InfoWorld.  They are likely to seem more geeky than might be desirable, but it will give you a feel for what is going on.  You will also get a very visceral feel for how fast it's all moving.
  2. When going to your trade association or other conferences, seek out the technology workshops and vendors and grill them for what the bleeding edge people are doing.  You may not want to be taking on bleeding edge projects until the technology has proved itself, but you need to know where people are pushing the envelope.
  3. Pay attention to technology in the popular press.  It is difficult to know how Web 2.0 will wind up affecting business (and if you don't know what Web 2.0 is then you've got some homework to do) but when you consider that MySpace gets more clicks per day than Google, that there are multiplayer role playing games out there with 110 million members worldwide, these are numbers way to big to ignore.  
Every leader's job is to be constantly enriching the tapestry that is his/her worldview.  We can't always know the implication of any individual thread in that tapestry.  But with things changing as fast as they are in today's world, the risk of winding up in an evolutionary dead end is just too great not to be pulling in information from every dimension of life. 

Technology is a challenge conceptually, culturally and economically.  Management luminary Peter Drucker once chastised business for being too dependent on computers.  What even he failed to grasp is the real power of computer technology is that technology creates the ability to do things that cannot be done any other way.  This is the real power of technology.  Ironically, it is the people in the system who are slowing down the process.  Technology is fundamentally changing the game.  Humans as a whole just can't wrap our brains around and adapt to change as fast as technology is capable of creating new opportunities.   

Therein lies both the challenge and opportunity for business leaders.

Words of Wisdom

| | Comments (0)
If you're not familiar with the name John W. Gardner click on the link to get a run down on his remarkable career.  In 1990, he published the best book on leadership I have run across in my career, appropriately entitled On Leadership.  I read it years ago and had reason to pull it off the shelf the other day to find a quote that I had remembered that I wanted to pass on to a client.  I think the quote is worth passing on to my readers as well:


To exercise leadership today, leaders must institutionalize their leadership.  The issues are too technical and the pace of change too swift to expect that a leader, no matter how gifted, will be able to solve personally the major problems facing the system over which he or she presides.  So we design an institutional system--a government agency, a corporation--to solve the problems, and then we select a leader who has the capacity to preside over and strengthen the system.  Some leaders may be quite gifted in solving problems personally, but if they fail to institutionalize the process, their departure leaves the system crippled.  They must create or strengthen systems that will survive them. 

John W. Gardner
from, 
On Leadership  


Recession - The best thing to ever happen to a business

| | Comments (0)

Given that economics is a behavioral science, one would think that the media would realize that trumpeting recession is just creating a self-fulfilling prophecy.  But if a slowdown hits your business, it doesn't matter why.  For those of you who are veteran survivors of recessions past, the following will be old hat.  But it's always good to be reminded of the basics.  Recessions are never fun and never easy but they are so important.  For a fun read and in important illustration of the importance of recessions, pick up a copy of Never Cry Wolf by Farley Mowat.

The following are my Seven Laws of Economic Jujitsu to use the downward momentum of a recessionary economy to fling you into greater levels of prosperity. 

  1. Attitude is everything.  It's easy to get discouraged when things slow down, but it's useful to remember that recessions are the most important things that happen in the life of a business.  Why?  Because it is only in a recession that you learn what you really need and really don't need to make your business work.  Prosperity can hide all manner of ills in your business.  So step one is get your head on straight and see this as an opportunity.  Your company needs to be a victim free zone.  You're not going to die over this so take a deep breath and do the work.
  2. Scrutinize all your expenses.  Ask yourself, "If we got rid of this would it impact quality or service to the customer?"  Ditching something might impact convenience for you, but that convenience may not be something you can afford right now.  Along with your expenses, look closely at your processes to eliminate waste.  If you aren't familiar with process improvement, get educated.  Read W. Edwards Deming's Out of the Crisis, the father of the quality disciplines who taught the Japanese how to do it or any of the other excellent books on the subject.
  3. Increase your market penetration.  You can't really save your way to prosperity since there is only so much cutting you can do without cutting your own throat, so increasing your market penetration is the answer.  When times are good, it's easy to go into cruise control.  It has been my experience that increasingly there are only two kinds of businesses: kick-ass marketing companies and companies that work for kick-ass marketing companies.  Guess who makes the money.  If you are not a marketer by nature, learn to think like a marketer.  Read Jay Conrad Levinson's Guerilla Marketing books.  There are many others relevant to entrepreneurs.  You probably don't care how Proctor & Gamble does it...that's a different world.  You need to learn how entrepreneurs do it.  Remember, even in a recession, there is massive amounts of money changing hands.  Your job is to figure out how to get your piece of it.  A logical starting point is to work your way up the food chain with your customers.  (More on that in another post.)
  4. Look at the internet.  I don't care what business you're in, if you aren't taking advantage of connecting with customers or prospective customers on the web then shame on you.  You're asleep at the switch.  If you don't know where to start, call Tom Walker at Web Teks (www.webteks.com).
  5. Take a hard look at your business and/or business model.  The world is changing around us with incredible speed.  Is your business in an evolutionary dead end?  Is your industry consolidating to the point where the small firms can no longer be generalists but must build their franchise around a narrow niche specialty?  We get so buried in the trees of daily operational details that it is very easy to miss the information that says your corner of the forest is on fire.  
  6. Break the cyclicality of your business.  If your business is intrinsically cyclical, start thinking about how you might diversify into areas that either aren't as cyclical or which are counter cyclical to your existing business.
  7. When things go non-linear, follow these rules: a) Stay awake.  You are going to have to let go of what you've been doing even though you don't what new things to do. b) Pay attention.  You need to question every assumption, scrutinize everything you're doing. c) Run experiments.  When the old stuff isn't working, you need to run lots of little, cheap experiments to gather the knowledge and information you need to find your new path.  As they say in Italy, rapido, piccolo, economico.  Fast, small and cheap. d) When something starts to work, throw more resources at it to validate that a new model or approach is actually working.  When you are clear you have a new trajectory to follow, institutionalize it, define it, publish it, train your people in it and promote it.   

Do all this stuff and you will look back on a recessionary time as the best thing that ever happened to you and you will never fear a recession again.
Lanny Goodman, CEO
Management
Technologies Inc.

414 1/2 Central Ave SE
Suite 4
Albuquerque NM 87102
(505) 884-7300

About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the Entrepreneurship category.

Business Travel is the previous category.

Innovation is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Pages